Jan Juc vs Oakleigh
Property investment comparison - Jan Juc, VIC 3228 vs Oakleigh, VIC 3166
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jan Juc wins 1, Oakleigh wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jan Juc | Oakleigh |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $585K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.06% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.74% | 5.65% |
| 1-year house growth | +0.3% | -0.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +5.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Population | 4,151 | 8,442 |
Jan Juc vs Oakleigh: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Jan Juc and $1.4M in Oakleigh.
Over the past year house prices moved +0.3% in Jan Juc and -0.9% in Oakleigh (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Jan Juc, while Oakleigh went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Oakleigh and 1.8% in Jan Juc, so landlords in Oakleigh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Oakleigh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,442 against 4,151, roughly 2.0 times the size of Jan Juc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Jan Juc for recent price momentum, Oakleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison