Jan Juc vs Yan Yean
Property investment comparison - Jan Juc, VIC 3228 vs Yan Yean, VIC 3755
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jan Juc wins 3, Yan Yean wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jan Juc | Yan Yean |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.06% | 1.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.74% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +5.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 12.4% |
| Population | 4,151 | 246 |
Jan Juc vs Yan Yean: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Jan Juc and $1.4M in Yan Yean, so Jan Juc is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Jan Juc leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 1.86% in Yan Yean, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Jan Juc and 12.4% in Yan Yean, so landlords in Jan Juc face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Jan Juc is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,151 against 246, roughly 17 times the size of Yan Yean; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Jan Juc for rental income, Jan Juc for a lower purchase price, Jan Juc for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison