Skip to main content

Jilliby vs Telopea

Property investment comparison - Jilliby, NSW 2259 vs Telopea, NSW 2117

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jilliby wins 3, Telopea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJillibyTelopea
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$585K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.88%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%4.23%
1-year house growth+12.4%+1.8%
3-year house growth-+2.1%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.1%
Population1,6945,356

Jilliby vs Telopea: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Jilliby and $2.0M in Telopea, so Telopea is the cheaper entry point, with Jilliby houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Jilliby sits at a median of $585K against $800K in Telopea, which makes Jilliby the more affordable unit market and Telopea the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.4% in Jilliby and +1.8% in Telopea, so recent momentum favours Jilliby, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Telopea and 1.5% in Jilliby, so landlords in Telopea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Telopea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,356 against 1,694, roughly 3.2 times the size of Jilliby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Telopea for a lower purchase price, Jilliby for recent price momentum, Telopea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison