Skip to main content

Jimboomba vs Windaroo

Property investment comparison - Jimboomba, QLD 4280 vs Windaroo, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jimboomba wins 0, Windaroo wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJimboombaWindaroo
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$1.0M$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)2.28%3.68%
1-year house growth+15.2%+18.8%
3-year house growth+26.7%+41.0%
Vacancy rate2.9%1.6%
Population7,4232,771

Jimboomba vs Windaroo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Jimboomba and $1.1M in Windaroo.

For units, Jimboomba sits at a median of $1.0M against $745K in Windaroo, which makes Windaroo the more affordable unit market and Jimboomba the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.2% in Jimboomba and +18.8% in Windaroo, so recent momentum favours Windaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Jimboomba houses are +26.7% and Windaroo houses +41.0%, so Windaroo has compounded faster than Jimboomba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Windaroo and 2.9% in Jimboomba, so landlords in Windaroo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Jimboomba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,423 against 2,771, roughly 2.7 times the size of Windaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windaroo for recent price momentum, Windaroo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison