Skip to main content

Joondanna vs Torndirrup

Property investment comparison - Joondanna, WA 6060 vs Torndirrup, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Joondanna wins 4, Torndirrup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJoondannaTorndirrup
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$730K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%3.89%
1-year house growth+22.1%+21.7%
3-year house growth+61.2%-
Vacancy rate0.4%2.5%
Population5,283395

Joondanna vs Torndirrup: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Joondanna and $1.3M in Torndirrup.

For units, Joondanna sits at a median of $730K against $755K in Torndirrup, which makes Joondanna the more affordable unit market and Torndirrup the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.1% in Joondanna and +21.7% in Torndirrup, so recent momentum favours Joondanna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Joondanna and 2.5% in Torndirrup, so landlords in Joondanna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Joondanna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,283 against 395, roughly 13 times the size of Torndirrup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Joondanna for recent price momentum, Joondanna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Joondanna vs Torndirrup: Suburb Comparison 2026