Skip to main content

Joondanna vs Yokine

Property investment comparison - Joondanna, WA 6060 vs Yokine, WA 6060

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Joondanna wins 3, Yokine wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJoondannaYokine
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$730K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%4.96%
1-year house growth+22.1%-
3-year house growth+61.2%-
Vacancy rate0.4%1.0%
Population5,28312,706

Joondanna vs Yokine: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Joondanna and $1.3M in Yokine, so Joondanna is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Joondanna sits at a median of $730K against $720K in Yokine, which makes Yokine the more affordable unit market and Joondanna the pricier one.

On cash flow, Joondanna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.34% in Yokine, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Joondanna and 1.0% in Yokine, so landlords in Joondanna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yokine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,706 against 5,283, roughly 2.4 times the size of Joondanna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Joondanna for rental income, Joondanna for a lower purchase price, Joondanna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison