Kalimna vs Pine Lodge
Property investment comparison - Kalimna, VIC 3909 vs Pine Lodge, VIC 3631
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalimna wins 1, Pine Lodge wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kalimna | Pine Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $560K | $560K |
| Median unit price | - | $990K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.56% | 5.94% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.30% | 2.62% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +20.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,350 | 267 |
Kalimna vs Pine Lodge: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Kalimna and $560K in Pine Lodge.
On cash flow, Pine Lodge leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.94%, compared with 4.56% in Kalimna, a gap of 1.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Pine Lodge and 1.5% in Kalimna, so landlords in Pine Lodge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kalimna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,350 against 267, roughly 5 times the size of Pine Lodge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Pine Lodge for rental income, Pine Lodge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison