Skip to main content

Kallangur vs Redlynch

Property investment comparison - Kallangur, QLD 4503 vs Redlynch, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kallangur wins 3, Redlynch wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKallangurRedlynch
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$720K$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.60%
1-year house growth+18.0%+16.9%
3-year house growth+47.9%+34.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.4%
Population21,76110,571

Kallangur vs Redlynch: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Kallangur and $920K in Redlynch.

For units, Kallangur sits at a median of $720K against $545K in Redlynch, which makes Redlynch the more affordable unit market and Kallangur the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.0% in Kallangur and +16.9% in Redlynch, so recent momentum favours Kallangur, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kallangur houses are +47.9% and Redlynch houses +34.2%, so Kallangur has compounded faster than Redlynch over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Kallangur and 1.4% in Redlynch, so landlords in Kallangur face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kallangur is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,761 against 10,571, roughly 2.1 times the size of Redlynch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kallangur for recent price momentum, Kallangur for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison