Skip to main content

Karawatha vs Moorooka

Property investment comparison - Karawatha, QLD 4117 vs Moorooka, QLD 4105

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Karawatha wins 4, Moorooka wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKarawathaMoorooka
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$955K$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%2.66%
Gross rental yield (units)2.33%3.90%
1-year house growth+18.4%estimate+15.4%
3-year house growth-+49.5%
Vacancy rate0.6%0.8%
Population33710,783

Karawatha vs Moorooka: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Karawatha and $1.4M in Moorooka, so Karawatha is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Karawatha sits at a median of $955K against $810K in Moorooka, which makes Moorooka the more affordable unit market and Karawatha the pricier one.

On cash flow, Karawatha leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 2.66% in Moorooka, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.4% in Karawatha (an estimate) and +15.4% in Moorooka, so recent momentum favours Karawatha, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Karawatha and 0.8% in Moorooka, so landlords in Karawatha face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moorooka is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,783 against 337, roughly 32 times the size of Karawatha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Karawatha for rental income, Karawatha for a lower purchase price, Karawatha for recent price momentum, Karawatha for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison