Katandra vs North Bendigo
Property investment comparison - Katandra, VIC 3634 vs North Bendigo, VIC 3550
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Katandra wins 1, North Bendigo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Katandra | North Bendigo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $575K | $575K |
| Median unit price | - | $465K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.56% | 4.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.24% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +11.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.0% | 1.8% |
| Population | 120 | 4,277 |
Katandra vs North Bendigo: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $575K in Katandra and $575K in North Bendigo.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.56% in Katandra and 4.55% in North Bendigo, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in North Bendigo and 4.0% in Katandra, so landlords in North Bendigo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Bendigo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,277 against 120, roughly 36 times the size of Katandra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Bendigo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison