Skip to main content

Kearns vs Wyee

Property investment comparison - Kearns, NSW 2558 vs Wyee, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kearns wins 1, Wyee wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKearnsWyee
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.29%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)3.56%5.09%
1-year house growth+7.0%+17.9%estimate
3-year house growth+30.9%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.4%
Population2,6932,909

Kearns vs Wyee: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Kearns and $1.1M in Wyee, so Wyee is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Wyee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 3.29% in Kearns, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Kearns and +17.9% in Wyee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kearns and 1.4% in Wyee, so landlords in Kearns face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wyee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,909 against 2,693, larger than Kearns; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyee for rental income, Wyee for a lower purchase price, Wyee for recent price momentum, Kearns for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison