Skip to main content

Kellyville vs Telopea

Property investment comparison - Kellyville, NSW 2155 vs Telopea, NSW 2117

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kellyville wins 2, Telopea wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKellyvilleTelopea
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$820K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.56%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.74%4.23%
1-year house growth+1.9%estimate+1.8%
3-year house growth-+2.1%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.1%
Population27,0115,356

Kellyville vs Telopea: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Kellyville and $2.0M in Telopea, so Telopea is the cheaper entry point, with Kellyville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kellyville sits at a median of $820K against $800K in Telopea, which makes Telopea the more affordable unit market and Kellyville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.9% in Kellyville (an estimate) and +1.8% in Telopea, so recent momentum favours Kellyville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Telopea and 2.1% in Kellyville, so landlords in Telopea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kellyville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,011 against 5,356, roughly 5 times the size of Telopea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Telopea for a lower purchase price, Kellyville for recent price momentum, Telopea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison