Skip to main content

Kelso vs Orient Point

Property investment comparison - Kelso, NSW 2795 vs Orient Point, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kelso wins 4, Orient Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKelsoOrient Point
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$420K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.09%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.65%
1-year house growth+6.7%+6.7%
3-year house growth+13.0%-1.2%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.3%
Population10,039629

Kelso vs Orient Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Kelso and $800K in Orient Point.

For units, Kelso sits at a median of $420K against $625K in Orient Point, which makes Kelso the more affordable unit market and Orient Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kelso leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.09%, compared with 3.57% in Orient Point, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Kelso houses are +13.0% and Orient Point houses -1.2%, so Kelso has compounded faster than Orient Point over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kelso and 1.3% in Orient Point, so landlords in Kelso face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kelso is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 629, roughly 16 times the size of Orient Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kelso for rental income, Kelso for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison