Skip to main content

Kenwick vs Port Kennedy

Property investment comparison - Kenwick, WA 6107 vs Port Kennedy, WA 6172

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kenwick wins 2, Port Kennedy wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKenwickPort Kennedy
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$650K$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.13%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%4.85%
1-year house growth+22.2%estimate+19.2%
3-year house growth-+72.9%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population5,68413,477

Kenwick vs Port Kennedy: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Kenwick and $850K in Port Kennedy.

For units, Kenwick sits at a median of $650K against $640K in Port Kennedy, which makes Port Kennedy the more affordable unit market and Kenwick the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.2% in Kenwick (an estimate) and +19.2% in Port Kennedy, so recent momentum favours Kenwick, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Port Kennedy and 1.6% in Kenwick, so landlords in Port Kennedy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Port Kennedy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,477 against 5,684, roughly 2.4 times the size of Kenwick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kenwick for recent price momentum, Port Kennedy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison