Skip to main content

Kilkivan vs Oonoonba

Property investment comparison - Kilkivan, QLD 4600 vs Oonoonba, QLD 4811

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kilkivan wins 0, Oonoonba wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKilkivanOonoonba
Median house price$590K$590K
Median unit price$355K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.29%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%-
1-year house growth+7.2%+17.1%
3-year house growth+30.4%+51.3%
Vacancy rate4.4%1.6%
Population6892,050

Kilkivan vs Oonoonba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $590K in Kilkivan and $590K in Oonoonba.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Kilkivan and +17.1% in Oonoonba, so recent momentum favours Oonoonba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kilkivan houses are +30.4% and Oonoonba houses +51.3%, so Oonoonba has compounded faster than Kilkivan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Oonoonba and 4.4% in Kilkivan, so landlords in Oonoonba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oonoonba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,050 against 689, roughly 3.0 times the size of Kilkivan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oonoonba for recent price momentum, Oonoonba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison