Skip to main content

Killara vs Nichols Point

Property investment comparison - Killara, VIC 3691 vs Nichols Point, VIC 3501

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Killara wins 3, Nichols Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKillaraNichols Point
Median house price$765K$765K
Median unit price$450K$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%3.01%
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%6.26%
1-year house growth+17.3%+6.0%estimate
3-year house growth+17.5%-
Vacancy rate3.3%3.6%
Population1,4851,723

Killara vs Nichols Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $765K in Killara and $765K in Nichols Point.

For units, Killara sits at a median of $450K against $405K in Nichols Point, which makes Nichols Point the more affordable unit market and Killara the pricier one.

On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.01% in Nichols Point, a gap of 1.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.3% in Killara and +6.0% in Nichols Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Killara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.3% in Killara and 3.6% in Nichols Point, so landlords in Killara face less competition for tenants.

Nichols Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,723 against 1,485, larger than Killara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Killara for rental income, Killara for recent price momentum, Killara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison