Skip to main content

Kilmore vs Strathtulloh

Property investment comparison - Kilmore, VIC 3764 vs Strathtulloh, VIC 3338

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kilmore wins 3, Strathtulloh wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKilmoreStrathtulloh
Median house price$630K$630K
Median unit price$445K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.15%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%-
1-year house growth+2.6%+0.0%
3-year house growth+3.4%-2.5%
Vacancy rate1.4%3.8%
Population9,2073,997

Kilmore vs Strathtulloh: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Kilmore and $630K in Strathtulloh.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in Kilmore and +0.0% in Strathtulloh, so recent momentum favours Kilmore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kilmore houses are +3.4% and Strathtulloh houses -2.5%, so Kilmore has compounded faster than Strathtulloh over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kilmore and 3.8% in Strathtulloh, so landlords in Kilmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kilmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,207 against 3,997, roughly 2.3 times the size of Strathtulloh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kilmore for recent price momentum, Kilmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison