Skip to main content

Kings Beach vs Tingalpa

Property investment comparison - Kings Beach, QLD 4551 vs Tingalpa, QLD 4173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kings Beach wins 0, Tingalpa wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKings BeachTingalpa
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$910K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%-
1-year house growth+11.8%estimate+12.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%1.0%
Population3,0428,461

Kings Beach vs Tingalpa: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Kings Beach and $1.2M in Tingalpa.

For units, Kings Beach sits at a median of $910K against $815K in Tingalpa, which makes Tingalpa the more affordable unit market and Kings Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tingalpa leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.73% in Kings Beach, a gap of 0.57 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Kings Beach (an estimate) and +12.8% in Tingalpa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tingalpa, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Tingalpa and 1.8% in Kings Beach, so landlords in Tingalpa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tingalpa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,461 against 3,042, roughly 2.8 times the size of Kings Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tingalpa for rental income, Tingalpa for recent price momentum, Tingalpa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison