Kings Langley vs Louth Park
Property investment comparison - Kings Langley, NSW 2147 vs Louth Park, NSW 2320
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kings Langley wins 0, Louth Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kings Langley | Louth Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | - | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.12% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.21% | 5.90% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.2% | +10.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Population | 9,354 | 922 |
Kings Langley vs Louth Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Kings Langley and $1.6M in Louth Park.
Over the past year house prices moved +3.2% in Kings Langley and +10.9% in Louth Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Louth Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Louth Park and 2.6% in Kings Langley, so landlords in Louth Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kings Langley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,354 against 922, roughly 10 times the size of Louth Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Louth Park for recent price momentum, Louth Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison