Skip to main content

Kingsgrove vs Thirroul

Property investment comparison - Kingsgrove, NSW 2208 vs Thirroul, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingsgrove wins 1, Thirroul wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingsgroveThirroul
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$815K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+3.3%estimate+4.5%
3-year house growth-+8.3%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.6%
Population12,8816,348

Kingsgrove vs Thirroul: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Kingsgrove and $1.9M in Thirroul, so Thirroul is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsgrove houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kingsgrove sits at a median of $815K against $1.2M in Thirroul, which makes Kingsgrove the more affordable unit market and Thirroul the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.3% in Kingsgrove (an estimate) and +4.5% in Thirroul, so recent momentum favours Thirroul, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Thirroul and 2.0% in Kingsgrove, so landlords in Thirroul face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kingsgrove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,881 against 6,348, roughly 2.0 times the size of Thirroul; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thirroul for a lower purchase price, Thirroul for recent price momentum, Thirroul for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Kingsgrove vs Thirroul: Suburb Comparison 2026