Kingston vs Murchison
Property investment comparison - Kingston, VIC 3364 vs Murchison, VIC 3610
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingston wins 3, Murchison wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kingston | Murchison |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $405K | $425K |
| Median unit price | $315K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.11% | 5.29% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.76% | 7.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 3.7% |
| Population | 190 | 884 |
Kingston vs Murchison: what the numbers say
The median house price is $405K in Kingston and $425K in Murchison, so Kingston is the cheaper entry point, with Murchison houses about 5% dearer.
On cash flow, Kingston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.11%, compared with 5.29% in Murchison, a gap of 1.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kingston and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Kingston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 190, roughly 4.7 times the size of Kingston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kingston for rental income, Kingston for a lower purchase price, Kingston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison