Kingston vs Yarram
Property investment comparison - Kingston, VIC 3364 vs Yarram, VIC 3971
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingston wins 2, Yarram wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kingston | Yarram |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $405K | $415K |
| Median unit price | $315K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.11% | 4.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.76% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Population | 190 | 2,136 |
Kingston vs Yarram: what the numbers say
The median house price is $405K in Kingston and $415K in Yarram, so Kingston is the cheaper entry point, with Yarram houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Kingston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.11%, compared with 4.45% in Yarram, a gap of 2.66 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yarram and 1.6% in Kingston, so landlords in Yarram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yarram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,136 against 190, roughly 11 times the size of Kingston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kingston for rental income, Kingston for a lower purchase price, Yarram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison