Skip to main content

Kinross vs Wattle Grove

Property investment comparison - Kinross, WA 6028 vs Wattle Grove, WA 6107

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kinross wins 3, Wattle Grove wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKinrossWattle Grove
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.08%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.60%
1-year house growth+22.9%+16.5%estimate
3-year house growth+60.0%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.8%
Population6,9886,547

Kinross vs Wattle Grove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Kinross and $1.0M in Wattle Grove, so Wattle Grove is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Kinross leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 3.80% in Wattle Grove, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.9% in Kinross and +16.5% in Wattle Grove (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kinross, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kinross and 1.8% in Wattle Grove, so landlords in Kinross face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kinross is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,988 against 6,547, larger than Wattle Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kinross for rental income, Wattle Grove for a lower purchase price, Kinross for recent price momentum, Kinross for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison