Skip to main content

Kogarah vs Wallarah

Property investment comparison - Kogarah, NSW 2217 vs Wallarah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kogarah wins 2, Wallarah wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKogarahWallarah
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$745K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%1.96%
Gross rental yield (units)5.02%5.04%
1-year house growth+5.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population16,416344

Kogarah vs Wallarah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Kogarah and $1.9M in Wallarah.

For units, Kogarah sits at a median of $745K against $580K in Wallarah, which makes Wallarah the more affordable unit market and Kogarah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kogarah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.96% in Wallarah, a gap of 0.50 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Kogarah and 1.1% in Wallarah, so landlords in Kogarah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kogarah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,416 against 344, roughly 48 times the size of Wallarah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kogarah for rental income, Kogarah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison