Skip to main content

Koolewong vs Rooty Hill

Property investment comparison - Koolewong, NSW 2256 vs Rooty Hill, NSW 2766

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Koolewong wins 4, Rooty Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKoolewongRooty Hill
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$690K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%4.12%
1-year house growth+8.8%+8.5%
3-year house growth+11.9%+29.2%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.6%
Population92016,176

Koolewong vs Rooty Hill: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Koolewong and $1.1M in Rooty Hill.

For units, Koolewong sits at a median of $690K against $840K in Rooty Hill, which makes Koolewong the more affordable unit market and Rooty Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.8% in Koolewong and +8.5% in Rooty Hill, so recent momentum favours Koolewong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Koolewong houses are +11.9% and Rooty Hill houses +29.2%, so Rooty Hill has compounded faster than Koolewong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Koolewong and 1.6% in Rooty Hill, so landlords in Koolewong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rooty Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,176 against 920, roughly 18 times the size of Koolewong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Koolewong for recent price momentum, Koolewong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison