Skip to main content

Kooringal vs Turondale

Property investment comparison - Kooringal, NSW 2650 vs Turondale, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kooringal wins 2, Turondale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKooringalTurondale
Median house price$660K$670K
Median unit price$385K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%5.35%
1-year house growth+13.8%-
3-year house growth+30.9%-
Vacancy rate2.5%0.7%
Population7,404103

Kooringal vs Turondale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $660K in Kooringal and $670K in Turondale, so Kooringal is the cheaper entry point, with Turondale houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Kooringal sits at a median of $385K against $445K in Turondale, which makes Kooringal the more affordable unit market and Turondale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Turondale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.30% in Kooringal, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Turondale and 2.5% in Kooringal, so landlords in Turondale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kooringal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,404 against 103, roughly 72 times the size of Turondale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Turondale for rental income, Kooringal for a lower purchase price, Turondale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison