Skip to main content

Kulangoor vs Margate

Property investment comparison - Kulangoor, QLD 4560 vs Margate, QLD 4019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kulangoor wins 2, Margate wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKulangoorMargate
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$230K$775K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.41%3.27%
Gross rental yield (units)6.52%-
1-year house growth+3.0%+13.6%estimate
3-year house growth+40.9%-
Vacancy rate2.7%0.6%
Population4557,575

Kulangoor vs Margate: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Kulangoor and $1.0M in Margate.

For units, Kulangoor sits at a median of $230K against $775K in Margate, which makes Kulangoor the more affordable unit market and Margate the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kulangoor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.41%, compared with 3.27% in Margate, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.0% in Kulangoor and +13.6% in Margate (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Margate, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Margate and 2.7% in Kulangoor, so landlords in Margate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Margate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,575 against 455, roughly 17 times the size of Kulangoor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kulangoor for rental income, Margate for recent price momentum, Margate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison