Skip to main content

Kurmond vs Soldiers Point

Property investment comparison - Kurmond, NSW 2757 vs Soldiers Point, NSW 2317

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kurmond wins 1, Soldiers Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKurmondSoldiers Point
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.9M$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.27%2.28%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.50%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+3.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate7.0%2.5%
Population8501,564

Kurmond vs Soldiers Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Kurmond and $1.6M in Soldiers Point.

For units, Kurmond sits at a median of $1.9M against $825K in Soldiers Point, which makes Soldiers Point the more affordable unit market and Kurmond the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.27% in Kurmond and 2.28% in Soldiers Point, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Kurmond (an estimate) and +3.2% in Soldiers Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kurmond, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Soldiers Point and 7.0% in Kurmond, so landlords in Soldiers Point face less competition for tenants.

Soldiers Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,564 against 850, larger than Kurmond; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kurmond for recent price momentum, Soldiers Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison