Skip to main content

Kurrajong Heights vs Wentworth Falls

Property investment comparison - Kurrajong Heights, NSW 2758 vs Wentworth Falls, NSW 2782

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kurrajong Heights wins 0, Wentworth Falls wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKurrajong HeightsWentworth Falls
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$3.2M-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.61%
1-year house growth+7.9%+11.6%estimate
3-year house growth+27.1%-
Vacancy rate8.5%0.4%
Population1,2556,428

Kurrajong Heights vs Wentworth Falls: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Kurrajong Heights and $1.2M in Wentworth Falls, so Wentworth Falls is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Kurrajong Heights and +11.6% in Wentworth Falls (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wentworth Falls, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Wentworth Falls and 8.5% in Kurrajong Heights, so landlords in Wentworth Falls face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wentworth Falls is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,428 against 1,255, roughly 5 times the size of Kurrajong Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wentworth Falls for a lower purchase price, Wentworth Falls for recent price momentum, Wentworth Falls for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison