Kurri Kurri vs Limekilns
Property investment comparison - Kurri Kurri, NSW 2327 vs Limekilns, NSW 2850
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kurri Kurri wins 1, Limekilns wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kurri Kurri | Limekilns |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $695K |
| Median unit price | $515K | $520K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 5.27% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.61% | 5.77% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +26.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 6,174 | 115 |
Kurri Kurri vs Limekilns: what the numbers say
The median house price is $700K in Kurri Kurri and $695K in Limekilns, so Limekilns is the cheaper entry point, with Kurri Kurri houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Kurri Kurri sits at a median of $515K against $520K in Limekilns, which makes Kurri Kurri the more affordable unit market and Limekilns the pricier one.
On cash flow, Limekilns leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.27%, compared with 4.20% in Kurri Kurri, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.
Kurri Kurri is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,174 against 115, roughly 54 times the size of Limekilns; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Limekilns for rental income, Limekilns for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison