Laceby vs Maldon
Property investment comparison - Laceby, VIC 3678 vs Maldon, VIC 3463
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Laceby wins 0, Maldon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Laceby | Maldon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | $480K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.81% | 3.35% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -1.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Population | 304 | 1,665 |
Laceby vs Maldon: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Laceby and $730K in Maldon.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Maldon and 2.0% in Laceby, so landlords in Maldon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Maldon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,665 against 304, roughly 5 times the size of Laceby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maldon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison