Skip to main content

Lake Wyangan vs Old Bar

Property investment comparison - Lake Wyangan, NSW 2680 vs Old Bar, NSW 2430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lake Wyangan wins 2, Old Bar wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLake WyanganOld Bar
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$395K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)5.18%5.20%
1-year house growth-7.8%estimate+6.7%
3-year house growth-+7.9%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.9%
Population8775,126

Lake Wyangan vs Old Bar: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Lake Wyangan and $830K in Old Bar.

For units, Lake Wyangan sits at a median of $395K against $550K in Old Bar, which makes Lake Wyangan the more affordable unit market and Old Bar the pricier one.

On cash flow, Old Bar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 3.18% in Lake Wyangan, a gap of 0.97 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -7.8% in Lake Wyangan (an estimate) and +6.7% in Old Bar, so recent momentum favours Old Bar, while Lake Wyangan went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Lake Wyangan and 1.9% in Old Bar, so landlords in Lake Wyangan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Old Bar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,126 against 877, roughly 6 times the size of Lake Wyangan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Old Bar for rental income, Old Bar for recent price momentum, Lake Wyangan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison