Skip to main content

Lakemba vs Sydney

Property investment comparison - Lakemba, NSW 2195 vs Sydney, NSW 2000

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakemba wins 2, Sydney wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakembaSydney
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$540K$1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.78%4.31%
Gross rental yield (units)5.30%5.20%
1-year house growth+2.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population17,09216,667

Lakemba vs Sydney: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Lakemba and $1.5M in Sydney, so Sydney is the cheaper entry point, with Lakemba houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lakemba sits at a median of $540K against $1M in Sydney, which makes Lakemba the more affordable unit market and Sydney the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sydney leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.31%, compared with 2.78% in Lakemba, a gap of 1.53 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Sydney and 1.6% in Lakemba, so landlords in Sydney face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakemba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,092 against 16,667, larger than Sydney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sydney for rental income, Sydney for a lower purchase price, Sydney for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison