Skip to main content

Lakes Entrance vs Moliagul

Property investment comparison - Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909 vs Moliagul, VIC 3472

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakes Entrance wins 2, Moliagul wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakes EntranceMoliagul
Median house price$540K$530K
Median unit price$430K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%3.65%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%-
1-year house growth+4.4%-
3-year house growth+0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population5,14580

Lakes Entrance vs Moliagul: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Lakes Entrance and $530K in Moliagul, so Moliagul is the cheaper entry point, with Lakes Entrance houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Lakes Entrance leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 3.65% in Moliagul, a gap of 1.15 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lakes Entrance and 1.6% in Moliagul, so landlords in Lakes Entrance face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 80, roughly 64 times the size of Moliagul; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakes Entrance for rental income, Moliagul for a lower purchase price, Lakes Entrance for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison