Skip to main content

Lalor Park vs Woodburn

Property investment comparison - Lalor Park, NSW 2147 vs Woodburn, NSW 2538

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lalor Park wins 2, Woodburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLalor ParkWoodburn
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$680K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.82%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)3.57%2.48%
1-year house growth+7.0%-
3-year house growth+15.2%-
Vacancy rate1.4%0.6%
Population7,834817

Lalor Park vs Woodburn: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Lalor Park and $1.1M in Woodburn.

For units, Lalor Park sits at a median of $680K against $700K in Woodburn, which makes Lalor Park the more affordable unit market and Woodburn the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woodburn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 2.82% in Lalor Park, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Woodburn and 1.4% in Lalor Park, so landlords in Woodburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lalor Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,834 against 817, roughly 10 times the size of Woodburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodburn for rental income, Woodburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison