Lane Cove vs Newrybar
Property investment comparison - Lane Cove, NSW 2066 vs Newrybar, NSW 2479
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lane Cove wins 3, Newrybar wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Lane Cove | Newrybar |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.2M | $3.2M |
| Median unit price | $975K | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.09% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.47% |
| 1-year house growth | -5.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +5.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 4.3% |
| Population | 12,363 | 532 |
Lane Cove vs Newrybar: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.2M in Lane Cove and $3.2M in Newrybar, so Lane Cove is the cheaper entry point, with Newrybar houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Lane Cove sits at a median of $975K against $1.1M in Newrybar, which makes Lane Cove the more affordable unit market and Newrybar the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lane Cove and 4.3% in Newrybar, so landlords in Lane Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lane Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,363 against 532, roughly 23 times the size of Newrybar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lane Cove for a lower purchase price, Lane Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison