Skip to main content

Langford vs Seville Grove

Property investment comparison - Langford, WA 6147 vs Seville Grove, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Langford wins 3, Seville Grove wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLangfordSeville Grove
Median house price$775K$780K
Median unit price$580K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%-
1-year house growth+17.4%+16.2%estimate
3-year house growth+77.3%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.1%
Population5,50511,408

Langford vs Seville Grove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $775K in Langford and $780K in Seville Grove, so Langford is the cheaper entry point, with Seville Grove houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Langford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.50% in Seville Grove, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.4% in Langford and +16.2% in Seville Grove (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Langford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Seville Grove and 1.2% in Langford, so landlords in Seville Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Seville Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,408 against 5,505, roughly 2.1 times the size of Langford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Langford for rental income, Langford for a lower purchase price, Langford for recent price momentum, Seville Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison