Skip to main content

Langford vs Yakamia

Property investment comparison - Langford, WA 6147 vs Yakamia, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Langford wins 2, Yakamia wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLangfordYakamia
Median house price$775K$770K
Median unit price$580K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%4.49%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%5.76%
1-year house growth+17.4%+23.2%
3-year house growth+77.3%+68.1%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.3%
Population5,5053,025

Langford vs Yakamia: what the numbers say

The median house price is $775K in Langford and $770K in Yakamia, so Yakamia is the cheaper entry point, with Langford houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Langford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.49% in Yakamia, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.4% in Langford and +23.2% in Yakamia, so recent momentum favours Yakamia, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Langford houses are +77.3% and Yakamia houses +68.1%, so Langford has compounded faster than Yakamia over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Yakamia and 1.2% in Langford, so landlords in Yakamia face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Langford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,505 against 3,025, larger than Yakamia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Langford for rental income, Yakamia for a lower purchase price, Yakamia for recent price momentum, Yakamia for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison