Skip to main content

Lansvale vs Mount Ousley

Property investment comparison - Lansvale, NSW 2166 vs Mount Ousley, NSW 2519

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lansvale wins 2, Mount Ousley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLansvaleMount Ousley
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$2.3M$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.96%
1-year house growth+2.4%+4.9%
3-year house growth+18.8%+17.9%
Vacancy rate0.2%2.4%
Population2,5951,611

Lansvale vs Mount Ousley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Lansvale and $1.2M in Mount Ousley.

For units, Lansvale sits at a median of $2.3M against $430K in Mount Ousley, which makes Mount Ousley the more affordable unit market and Lansvale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.4% in Lansvale and +4.9% in Mount Ousley, so recent momentum favours Mount Ousley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lansvale houses are +18.8% and Mount Ousley houses +17.9%, so Lansvale has compounded faster than Mount Ousley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Lansvale and 2.4% in Mount Ousley, so landlords in Lansvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lansvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,595 against 1,611, larger than Mount Ousley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Ousley for recent price momentum, Lansvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison