Skip to main content

Lara vs Mount Duneed

Property investment comparison - Lara, VIC 3212 vs Mount Duneed, VIC 3217

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lara wins 4, Mount Duneed wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLaraMount Duneed
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$560K$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%4.50%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+3.0%
3-year house growth-+0.4%
Vacancy rate1.7%2.9%
Population19,0146,182

Lara vs Mount Duneed: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Lara and $730K in Mount Duneed.

For units, Lara sits at a median of $560K against $615K in Mount Duneed, which makes Lara the more affordable unit market and Mount Duneed the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.10% in Lara and 4.10% in Mount Duneed, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Lara (an estimate) and +3.0% in Mount Duneed, so recent momentum favours Lara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Lara and 2.9% in Mount Duneed, so landlords in Lara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,014 against 6,182, roughly 3.1 times the size of Mount Duneed; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lara for recent price momentum, Lara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison