Skip to main content

Largs Bay vs Middleton

Property investment comparison - Largs Bay, SA 5016 vs Middleton, SA 5213

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Largs Bay wins 2, Middleton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLargs BayMiddleton
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price-$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%4.43%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+12.5%
3-year house growth-+15.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.9%
Population4,1041,298

Largs Bay vs Middleton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Largs Bay and $1.0M in Middleton, so Middleton is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Largs Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.17%, compared with 3.06% in Middleton, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Largs Bay (an estimate) and +12.5% in Middleton, so recent momentum favours Middleton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Largs Bay and 1.9% in Middleton, so landlords in Largs Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Largs Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,104 against 1,298, roughly 3.2 times the size of Middleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Largs Bay for rental income, Middleton for a lower purchase price, Middleton for recent price momentum, Largs Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison