Skip to main content

Leumeah vs Macquarie Hills

Property investment comparison - Leumeah, NSW 2560 vs Macquarie Hills, NSW 2285

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Leumeah wins 2, Macquarie Hills wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLeumeahMacquarie Hills
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$610K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.03%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%3.89%
1-year house growth+9.3%+13.9%
3-year house growth+21.7%+27.0%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.3%
Population9,9923,605

Leumeah vs Macquarie Hills: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Leumeah and $1M in Macquarie Hills.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Leumeah and +13.9% in Macquarie Hills, so recent momentum favours Macquarie Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Leumeah houses are +21.7% and Macquarie Hills houses +27.0%, so Macquarie Hills has compounded faster than Leumeah over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Leumeah and 1.3% in Macquarie Hills, so landlords in Leumeah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Leumeah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,992 against 3,605, roughly 2.8 times the size of Macquarie Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Macquarie Hills for recent price momentum, Leumeah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison