Skip to main content

Lidcombe vs Miranda

Property investment comparison - Lidcombe, NSW 2141 vs Miranda, NSW 2228

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lidcombe wins 5, Miranda wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLidcombeMiranda
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$790K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.56%
Gross rental yield (units)5.35%4.39%
1-year house growth+9.7%+4.4%
3-year house growth+31.0%+19.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population23,66317,942

Lidcombe vs Miranda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Lidcombe and $2.0M in Miranda, so Lidcombe is the cheaper entry point, with Miranda houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lidcombe sits at a median of $790K against $840K in Miranda, which makes Lidcombe the more affordable unit market and Miranda the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.7% in Lidcombe and +4.4% in Miranda, so recent momentum favours Lidcombe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lidcombe houses are +31.0% and Miranda houses +19.2%, so Lidcombe has compounded faster than Miranda over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Miranda and 1.6% in Lidcombe, so landlords in Miranda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lidcombe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,663 against 17,942, larger than Miranda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lidcombe for a lower purchase price, Lidcombe for recent price momentum, Miranda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison