Skip to main content

Lilyfield vs Stanmore

Property investment comparison - Lilyfield, NSW 2040 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lilyfield wins 1, Stanmore wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLilyfieldStanmore
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.5M$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)2.34%3.50%
1-year house growth+7.9%+5.5%estimate
3-year house growth+0.4%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population7,6417,619

Lilyfield vs Stanmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Lilyfield and $2.6M in Stanmore, so Stanmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Lilyfield sits at a median of $1.5M against $980K in Stanmore, which makes Stanmore the more affordable unit market and Lilyfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Lilyfield and +5.5% in Stanmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lilyfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Stanmore and 1.6% in Lilyfield, so landlords in Stanmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lilyfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,641 against 7,619, larger than Stanmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stanmore for a lower purchase price, Lilyfield for recent price momentum, Stanmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison