Liston vs Quirindi
Property investment comparison - Liston, NSW 2372 vs Quirindi, NSW 2343
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Liston wins 0, Quirindi wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Liston | Quirindi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $455K | $450K |
| Median unit price | $210K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.71% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.15% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +54.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.2% |
| Population | 130 | 3,355 |
Liston vs Quirindi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $455K in Liston and $450K in Quirindi, so Quirindi is the cheaper entry point, with Liston houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Quirindi and 1.8% in Liston, so landlords in Quirindi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Quirindi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,355 against 130, roughly 26 times the size of Liston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Quirindi for a lower purchase price, Quirindi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison