Skip to main content

Lockhart vs Tingha

Property investment comparison - Lockhart, NSW 2656 vs Tingha, NSW 2360

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lockhart wins 2, Tingha wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLockhartTingha
Median house price$385K$385K
Median unit price$660K$280K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.79%6.38%
Gross rental yield (units)2.10%5.85%
1-year house growth+11.6%-10.0%estimate
3-year house growth+35.5%+10.3%
Vacancy rate0.7%-
Population1,019774

Lockhart vs Tingha: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $385K in Lockhart and $385K in Tingha.

For units, Lockhart sits at a median of $660K against $280K in Tingha, which makes Tingha the more affordable unit market and Lockhart the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tingha leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.38%, compared with 5.79% in Lockhart, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Lockhart and -10.0% in Tingha (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lockhart, while Tingha went backwards.

Looking back three years, Lockhart houses are +35.5% and Tingha houses +10.3%, so Lockhart has compounded faster than Tingha over the longer window.

Lockhart is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,019 against 774, larger than Tingha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tingha for rental income, Lockhart for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison