Skip to main content

Loftus vs Padstow

Property investment comparison - Loftus, NSW 2232 vs Padstow, NSW 2211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Loftus wins 1, Padstow wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLoftusPadstow
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price-$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.04%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.13%3.75%
1-year house growth+5.1%+4.4%
3-year house growth+10.9%+24.9%
Vacancy rate1.7%0.9%
Population4,19014,017

Loftus vs Padstow: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.7M in Loftus and $1.7M in Padstow.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Loftus and +4.4% in Padstow, so recent momentum favours Loftus, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Loftus houses are +10.9% and Padstow houses +24.9%, so Padstow has compounded faster than Loftus over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Padstow and 1.7% in Loftus, so landlords in Padstow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Padstow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,017 against 4,190, roughly 3.3 times the size of Loftus; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Loftus for recent price momentum, Padstow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison