Skip to main content

Longueville vs Tennyson Point

Property investment comparison - Longueville, NSW 2066 vs Tennyson Point, NSW 2111

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Longueville wins 4, Tennyson Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLonguevilleTennyson Point
Median house price$4.5M$4.7M
Median unit price$900K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.48%2.04%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%3.20%
1-year house growth-2.0%+3.0%estimate
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate1.3%4.6%
Population2,1161,247

Longueville vs Tennyson Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.5M in Longueville and $4.7M in Tennyson Point, so Longueville is the cheaper entry point, with Tennyson Point houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Longueville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.48%, compared with 2.04% in Tennyson Point, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.0% in Longueville and +3.0% in Tennyson Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tennyson Point, while Longueville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Longueville and 4.6% in Tennyson Point, so landlords in Longueville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Longueville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,116 against 1,247, larger than Tennyson Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Longueville for rental income, Longueville for a lower purchase price, Tennyson Point for recent price momentum, Longueville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison