Skip to main content

Longwarry vs Rockbank

Property investment comparison - Longwarry, VIC 3816 vs Rockbank, VIC 3335

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Longwarry wins 5, Rockbank wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLongwarryRockbank
Median house price$630K$630K
Median unit price$525K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.57%4.33%
1-year house growth+6.0%+1.4%
3-year house growth+9.4%-0.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%4.9%
Population2,4362,583

Longwarry vs Rockbank: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Longwarry and $630K in Rockbank.

For units, Longwarry sits at a median of $525K against $530K in Rockbank, which makes Longwarry the more affordable unit market and Rockbank the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Longwarry and +1.4% in Rockbank, so recent momentum favours Longwarry, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Longwarry houses are +9.4% and Rockbank houses -0.2%, so Longwarry has compounded faster than Rockbank over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Longwarry and 4.9% in Rockbank, so landlords in Longwarry face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rockbank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,583 against 2,436, larger than Longwarry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Longwarry for recent price momentum, Longwarry for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Longwarry vs Rockbank: Property Investment Comparison (2026)