Skip to main content

Lynbrook vs Portarlington

Property investment comparison - Lynbrook, VIC 3975 vs Portarlington, VIC 3222

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lynbrook wins 2, Portarlington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLynbrookPortarlington
Median house price$895K$890K
Median unit price$670K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%2.90%
1-year house growth+7.3%-
3-year house growth+14.2%-
Vacancy rate1.7%0.6%
Population9,1214,436

Lynbrook vs Portarlington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $895K in Lynbrook and $890K in Portarlington, so Portarlington is the cheaper entry point, with Lynbrook houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lynbrook sits at a median of $670K against $760K in Portarlington, which makes Lynbrook the more affordable unit market and Portarlington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Portarlington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.65% in Lynbrook, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Portarlington and 1.7% in Lynbrook, so landlords in Portarlington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lynbrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,121 against 4,436, roughly 2.1 times the size of Portarlington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Portarlington for rental income, Portarlington for a lower purchase price, Portarlington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison